Duchess of Argyll -- Margaret Campbell
Stolen Polaroids, 88 alleged lovers, and a 'headless man' -- the scandal that destroyed a duchess.
Key Facts
What Happened
Margaret Whigham was one of the most celebrated society beauties of her era -- a debutante, heiress, and fashion icon who married the 11th Duke of Argyll in 1951. Her second marriage (she had previously been married to Charles Sweeny) brought her the title of Duchess and ownership of Inveraray Castle. But the glamorous facade concealed a relationship that was deteriorating rapidly.
In 1963, the Duke filed for divorce, producing evidence he had obtained by hiring a locksmith to break into a locked cupboard at their Mayfair townhouse at 48 Upper Grosvenor Street. Inside, he found Polaroid photographs of the Duchess in intimate situations with an unidentified man -- the infamous 'headless man' whose face was not visible in the photographs. The Duke accused Margaret of infidelity with 88 men, compiling a detailed list that allegedly included government ministers and members of the royal family.
Lord Denning was tasked by the government to identify the 'headless man.' The five chief suspects included politician Duncan Sandys (Winston Churchill's former son-in-law), Hollywood actor Douglas Fairbanks Jr., and German diplomat Sigismund von Braun. Handwriting analysis reportedly pointed to Fairbanks, but the findings were never officially published. The presiding judge, Lord Wheatley, granted the divorce and described Margaret as 'a completely promiscuous woman whose sexual appetite could only be satisfied with a number of men.'
The divorce financially destroyed Margaret. Legal costs consumed what remained of her fortune. She was forced to open her Mayfair townhouse for paid public tours and eventually moved to a suite at the Grosvenor House Hotel. She died in 1993, largely penniless. The case is now widely viewed as a misogynistic miscarriage of justice -- Margaret was publicly shamed and financially ruined based on stolen evidence, while the men involved faced no consequences whatsoever.
Legal Breakdown: Stolen intimate evidence used in court
Illegally Obtained Evidence
The Duke hired a locksmith to break into Margaret's private cupboard -- an act that would likely be inadmissible under modern evidence law. Today, evidence obtained through breaking and entering, hacking, or unauthorized surveillance is typically excluded from court proceedings. However, the rules vary by jurisdiction, and some courts still admit improperly obtained evidence if it is deemed sufficiently probative.
Gender Bias in Judicial Findings
Judge Lord Wheatley's characterization of Margaret as 'completely promiscuous' reflected profound gender bias. The Duke's own infidelities were barely mentioned. Modern family law has moved toward no-fault divorce precisely to avoid this kind of moralistic judgment, but implicit bias in judicial proceedings remains a concern.
Financial Devastation Through Legal Costs
Margaret's legal costs consumed her entire fortune. This outcome -- where the cost of litigation exceeds the value of the assets being divided -- remains one of the greatest risks in contested divorces. Mediation, arbitration, and collaborative divorce methods exist specifically to prevent this kind of financial self-destruction.
What This Means for Your Divorce
- →Secure your private materials -- physical and digital -- as soon as separation seems possible.
- →Evidence obtained illegally may still be used against you in some jurisdictions; understand your local rules.
- →Protracted, adversarial divorce litigation can financially destroy both parties; consider mediation or collaborative divorce.
- →Gender bias in divorce proceedings, while reduced, has not been eliminated -- choose your legal team accordingly.
Going Through a Divorce?
Get confidential guidance tailored to your situation — free, private, and available 24/7.
Related Cases
Sir Paul McCartney & Heather Mills
United Kingdom · 2008
She asked for £125 million — the judge awarded a fifth of that
OtherPrince Andrew, Duke of York & Sarah Ferguson
United Kingdom · 1996
Scandalous photos, financial chaos, and a couple that kept living together for decades after divorce
OtherAdnan Khashoggi & Soraya Khashoggi
United Kingdom · 1982
She claimed $2.5 billion, documented a lifestyle of yachts and palaces, and walked away with $900 million
OtherWas this helpful? Help us keep it free.
divorce911.ai is funded entirely by donations. Every dollar keeps the AI assistant and 1,700+ guides free for people in crisis.
Know someone going through a divorce? This could help them.
This article is based on publicly available court records, news reports, and legal analysis. It is provided for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by reading this content.
Divorce laws vary by jurisdiction. Always consult a licensed attorney in your area before making legal decisions.