Charles Dickens & Catherine Hogarth: The Literary Giant Who Publicly Shamed His Wife

What Happened

Charles Dickens and Catherine Hogarth married in 1836 and had ten children together over 22 years. By the 1850s, however, Dickens had grown deeply unhappy in the marriage. He blamed Catherine for being fat, incompetent, and mentally unfit — characterizations that modern scholars view as cruel and largely unfounded. The real catalyst for separation was Dickens's infatuation with Ellen 'Nelly' Ternan, an 18-year-old actress he met in 1857 when he was 45.

The separation was triggered in spring 1858 when a bracelet Dickens purchased for Ellen was accidentally delivered to the family home. Catherine confronted him, and Dickens responded not with contrition but with fury. He demanded a separation and mounted a public campaign to blame Catherine. He published a personal statement in his journal Household Words on June 12, 1858, denying rumors of an affair while simultaneously implying that Catherine was an unfit mother and mentally deficient. He even tried to have Catherine declared insane and committed to an asylum.

The separation deed, finalized without a court hearing, was devastating for Catherine. She received an annual allowance of £600 and was given custody of only one child — their eldest son, Charley. The other nine children remained with Dickens and were largely managed by Catherine's own sister, Georgina Hogarth, who sided with Dickens. Most of Catherine's friends and society figures supported her, with Elizabeth Barrett Browning calling Dickens's behavior 'criminal,' but Catherine had virtually no legal recourse under Victorian law.

Dickens's treatment of Catherine exposed a fundamental hypocrisy: the man who championed the poor, the orphaned, and the oppressed in his novels showed no such compassion to his own wife. Catherine never publicly criticized Dickens. Before her death in 1879, she gave Dickens's letters to her daughter, saying: 'Give these to the British Museum, that the world may know he loved me once.' The letters were indeed donated and stand as quiet testimony to a marriage destroyed by one spouse's cruelty and public manipulation.

Legal Breakdown: When public reputation is weaponized in divorce

What This Means for Your Divorce