Diane von Furstenberg & Prince Egon: The Fashion Icon Who Kept the Royal Name
She divorced the prince but kept his name, building it into one of fashion's most iconic brands worth hundreds of millions.
Key Facts
What Happened
Diane Simone Michelle Halfin was born in Brussels in 1946 to a Romanian Jewish mother who survived Auschwitz. In 1969, at age 22, she married Prince Egon von Furstenberg, a Swiss-born member of the German princely House of Furstenberg. The marriage instantly transformed the young Belgian woman into a princess and gave her the aristocratic name that would become one of fashion's most valuable brands. They had two children, Alexandre and Tatiana, before separating in 1972, just three years into the marriage.
Despite their separation, Diane used the von Furstenberg name to launch her fashion career. In 1974, she created the iconic wrap dress, a design that symbolized the women's liberation movement and sold millions of units. By 1976, Newsweek had put her on its cover as the most marketable woman in fashion since Coco Chanel. The von Furstenberg name, with its aristocratic cachet, was inseparable from the brand's identity and appeal.
The couple did not formally divorce until 1983, a full eleven years after their separation. The specific financial terms were never disclosed. What Diane retained, however, was far more valuable than any cash settlement: the right to continue using the von Furstenberg name. She built DVF (Diane von Furstenberg) into a global fashion house with revenues in the hundreds of millions. The name itself, evoking European royalty and sophistication, was arguably her most important business asset.
After the divorce, Diane and Egon remained remarkably close. He sent her a gift every year on their would-be wedding anniversary, and they continued to spend every Christmas together with their children until Egon's death in 2004. In 2001, Diane married media mogul Barry Diller, who had been her partner since 1976. The von Furstenberg case is a masterclass in how a divorced name, particularly an aristocratic one, can become the foundation of a commercial empire.
Legal Breakdown: Branding, Identity, and Name Retention After Divorce
Name Retention After Divorce
In most jurisdictions, a person who changes their name through marriage has the legal right to continue using that name after divorce. Diane's continued use of 'von Furstenberg' was legally straightforward but commercially invaluable. For individuals who have built professional reputations or businesses under a married name, the right to retain it can be one of the most important aspects of a divorce settlement.
Brand Value as a Marital Asset
While the DVF brand was largely built during the period of separation rather than the marriage itself, the foundations, including the name and initial designs, originated during the marriage. In modern divorce proceedings, the value of brands, trademarks, and intellectual property created during a marriage is subject to division. The timing of Diane's brand development, mostly post-separation, likely limited any claims Egon might have had.
Extended Separation Before Formal Divorce
The 11-year gap between separation (1972) and formal divorce (1983) is noteworthy. During this period, both parties' financial situations changed dramatically. Extended separations can create complex questions about which assets are marital and which are separate. Most jurisdictions use the date of separation, not the date of divorce, as the cutoff for marital asset accumulation.
What This Means for Your Divorce
- →The right to retain a married name after divorce can have enormous commercial value, particularly in branding and fashion.
- →Brands and intellectual property developed during a marriage are potentially divisible marital assets; document their creation timeline carefully.
- →Extended separations before formal divorce create complex questions about asset classification that should be resolved early.
- →Amicable post-divorce relationships are possible and can benefit both parties, especially when children and shared history are involved.
Going Through a Divorce?
Get confidential guidance tailored to your situation — free, private, and available 24/7.
Related Cases
Sir Paul McCartney & Heather Mills
United Kingdom · 2008
She asked for £125 million — the judge awarded a fifth of that
OtherNicolas Sarkozy & Cécilia Ciganer-Albéniz
France · 2007
He became president in May — she filed for divorce in October
OtherVladimir Potanin & Natalia Potanina
Russia · 2014–present
Russia's second-richest man, a $7 billion claim, and a legal battle across continents
Other¿Te fue útil? Ayúdanos a mantenerlo gratis.
divorce911.ai se financia completamente con donaciones. Cada dólar mantiene al asistente IA y las 1,700+ guías gratis para personas en crisis.
Know someone going through a divorce? This could help them.
This article is based on publicly available court records, news reports, and legal analysis. It is provided for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by reading this content.
Divorce laws vary by jurisdiction. Always consult a licensed attorney in your area before making legal decisions.