Allen Iverson & Tawanna Turner: The NBA Legend Who Couldn't Afford a Cheeseburger
He earned $200 million but screamed in court that he couldn't afford a cheeseburger. A Reebok trust fund saved his future.
Key Facts
What Happened
Allen Iverson earned approximately $200 million during his NBA career, but by the time his divorce from Tawanna Turner was underway, nearly all of it was gone. The couple married in 2001 and had five children together, but Iverson's gambling, extravagant spending, and lifestyle consumed his fortune at an alarming rate. Turner initially filed for divorce in 2010, citing Iverson's infidelity and erratic behavior, but the couple briefly reconciled before she filed again in 2011.
The divorce proceedings became legendary for a single courtroom outburst. During a 2012 hearing in Fulton County Superior Court, Iverson allegedly shouted at Turner: 'I don't even have money for a cheeseburger!' The comment, reported by the Washington Post, became a symbol of how even the highest-paid athletes can spend their way to destitution. At the time, Iverson's monthly expenses reportedly exceeded $360,000, but his income had dried up after leaving the NBA.
The settlement, reached in 2013, awarded Turner a $3 million lump sum and child support for their five children. Crucially, the settlement also addressed a $32 million trust fund that Reebok had set up for Iverson as part of a lifetime endorsement deal. Under the terms of an unusual postnuptial agreement, Turner was entitled to the entire trust fund if Iverson violated certain conditions. However, in a gesture that surprised many observers, Turner agreed not to pursue the full trust, allowing Iverson to retain half. The trust does not pay out until Iverson turns 55 in 2030.
Perhaps the most remarkable twist in the story is that despite their bitter divorce, Iverson and Turner reconciled almost immediately after the paperwork was finalized. They have been seen together publicly on numerous occasions since, and Iverson has publicly acknowledged Turner as the love of his life. The Reebok trust fund, which cannot be touched until 2030, effectively serves as a forced savings mechanism that will provide Iverson with financial security in retirement, regardless of his spending habits.
Legal Breakdown: Protecting Assets Through Trust Funds
Trust Funds as Financial Protection
Iverson's Reebok trust fund, structured to pay out at age 55, was designed to protect the athlete from his own spending habits. During divorce proceedings, such trusts become highly contested assets. Turner's legal right to the entire fund under their postnuptial agreement gave her enormous leverage in negotiations.
Postnuptial Agreements and Their Power
The postnuptial agreement between Iverson and Turner included provisions that could have awarded Turner the entire $32 million trust. Postnuptial agreements, while less common than prenups, can be powerful tools for modifying the financial terms of a marriage. They are especially relevant when circumstances change dramatically during the marriage.
Divorcing a Financially Irresponsible Spouse
When one spouse has demonstrated financial irresponsibility, the settlement must account for the risk that ordered payments may not be made. Turner's attorneys likely considered Iverson's spending patterns when negotiating the lump sum rather than relying solely on ongoing support payments that might not materialize.
What This Means for Your Divorce
- →Even $200 million in career earnings can evaporate without proper financial management.
- →Trust funds with delayed payouts can protect high earners from their own worst financial instincts.
- →Postnuptial agreements can be as powerful as prenuptial agreements for protecting marital assets.
- →Sometimes the best outcome is a fair settlement that preserves enough goodwill for potential reconciliation.
Going Through a Divorce?
Get confidential guidance tailored to your situation — free, private, and available 24/7.
Related Cases
Mel Gibson & Robyn Moore
United States · 2011
31 years of marriage, no prenup, and California's community property law gave her half of everything — $425 million
Money & AssetsHarrison Ford & Melissa Mathison
United States · 2004
No prenup meant she received a portion of future Star Wars and Indiana Jones royalties — forever
Money & AssetsHarold Hamm & Sue Ann Arnall
United States · 2015
He wrote her a check for nearly a billion dollars -- she refused to cash it because it wasn't enough
Money & Assets¿Te fue útil? Ayúdanos a mantenerlo gratis.
divorce911.ai se financia completamente con donaciones. Cada dólar mantiene al asistente IA y las 1,700+ guías gratis para personas en crisis.
Know someone going through a divorce? This could help them.
This article is based on publicly available court records, news reports, and legal analysis. It is provided for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created by reading this content.
Divorce laws vary by jurisdiction. Always consult a licensed attorney in your area before making legal decisions.